TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Schwartz v. Kraft

Samuel Schwartz v. Daniel Kraft, Harry Kelly and Edward M. Kelly

Schwartz v. Kraft, 253 A.D. 736 (1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 10, 1937
Citations
253 A.D. 736300 N.Y.S. 6451937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5379

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

While riding as a guest passenger in an automobile, the plaintiff, then an infant, sustained personal injuries resulting from a collision between the automobile and wooden horses surrounding an excavation in the highway under repair. The record indicates that there were no lights or warning signs on the obstruction, and that the driver was negligent. In this action to recover damages the trial justice dismissed the complaint at the end of the plaintiff’s case on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. As the record stands, the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence was one of fact that should have been submitted to the jury. (Nelson v. Nygren, 259 N. Y. 71, 75, 76 .) Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.,' concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Nelson v. Nygren, 181 N.E. 52 (N.Y. 1932) 74

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list