TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sullivan v. State

Henry Sullivan v. The State of New York

Sullivan v. State, 257 A.D. 893 (1939)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 24, 1939
Docket
No. Claim No. 25228
Citations
257 A.D. 89312 N.Y.S.2d 504

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Claimant, while a convict imprisoned in Great Meadow Prison, was injured in cleaning a bread-slicing machine. His right thumb, index, middle and ring fingers were amputated. There was an eighty per cent loss of use of the right hand, and a marked deformity. A civilian official had control of an electric switch that motivated the device, and a convict directed claimant’s activities. The machine could be stopped by a switch thereon, and also, by the one located on the general switchboard in another room, the latter, as stated, under the control of the civilian guard. Claimant was injured during the first day he worked at bread slicing. On several prior occasions the machine had stopped without known cause and the convict then in charge had notified the civilian guard. On the day of the injury the machine again ceased to function without known cause. The convict in charge directed claimant to clean the machine, but did not turn off the switch thereon nor instruct claimant to do so. During the cleaning it started without known cause, and the injuries resulted. Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment of $6,000 in favor of claimant directed. The court reverses the following findings contained in the decision: Numbers 9,10, 11, 12, 13 and all conclusions of law. New findings are made by the court as follows: Numbers 1 to 45, both inclusive, as requested in the claimant’s proposed findings. And a further finding is made that claimant was damaged in the sum of $6,000. All concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1940: 11950: 11955: 11957: 11962: 11980: 119402026peak 1940 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Alliance Company v. State Hospital at Butner85 S.E.2d 386 (N.C. 1955)
  2. Henry Winston v. United States305 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1962)
  3. Grouchulski v. New York481 F. Supp. 1294 (N.D.N.Y. 1980)
  4. Cassidy v. State5 Misc. 2d 835 (1957)
  5. Blassman v. State258 A.D. 365 (1940)
  6. Washington v. State277 A.D.2d 1079 (1950)

Most recent

  1. Grouchulski v. New York481 F. Supp. 1294 (N.D.N.Y. 1980)
  2. Henry Winston v. United States305 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1962)
  3. Cassidy v. State5 Misc. 2d 835 (1957)
  4. Alliance Company v. State Hospital at Butner85 S.E.2d 386 (N.C. 1955)
  5. Washington v. State277 A.D.2d 1079 (1950)
  6. Blassman v. State258 A.D. 365 (1940)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list