TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Atlas Advertising Agency, Inc. v. Casa Cubana, Inc.

In the Matter of the Supplementary Proceedings: Atlas Advertising Agency, Inc., Judgment Creditor v. Casa Cubana, Inc., Judgment Debtor. Mateo Palmer, Assignee

Atlas Advert. Agency, Inc. v. Casa Cubana, Inc., 259 A.D. 951 (1940)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 22, 1940
Citations
259 A.D. 95119 N.Y.S.2d 9001940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7405

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal from an order of the Special Term of the Supreme Court, Albany county, which order directed the Comptroller of the Stake of New York to pay to the receiver of the judgment debtor herein on motion of Atlas Advertising Agency, Inc., judgment creditor-respondent herein, certain moneys in his possession, being the amount of a refund of a surrendered liquor license. There is no dispute as to the facts. Upon a motion under section 796 of the Civil Practice Act the court determined the question of law and held that the lien of the defendant Atlas Advertising Agency, Inc., judgment creditor-respondent, was superior in equity to that of Palmer, claimantassignee-appellant. The justice presiding at Special Term held upon the authority of Zartman v. First National Bank ( 189 N. Y. 267 ) and Titusville Iron Co. v. City of New York (207 id. 203) that an equitable assignment of moneys due from a liquor license refund executed before the fund came into existence is subordinate to the lien of creditors serving third-party subpoenas upon the Comptroller after the surrender of the license and the creation of the fund. (See, also, Alchar *952 Realty Corp. v. Meredith Restaurant, Inc., 256 App. Div. 853 ; Schaefer Brewing Co. v. Amsterdam Tavern, Inc., 171 Misc. 352 ; Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, § 127.) The order appealed from should be affirmed. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Sehenck, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1941: 11942: 11943: 11944: 11951: 11954: 11955: 21956: 11957: 11966: 119412026peak 1955 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Ideal Mercantile Corporation143 F. Supp. 810 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)
  2. Capitol Distributors Corp. v. 2131 Eighth Avenue, Inc.205 Misc. 824 (1954)
  3. In re Silver Cup Bar & Grill, Inc.50 F. Supp. 528 (S.D.N.Y. 1942)
  4. City of New York v. Bedford Bar & Grill, Inc.141 N.E.2d 575 (N.Y. 1957)
  5. Cohen v. First National City Bank49 Misc. 2d 141 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1966)
  6. Capitol Distributors Corp. v. 2131 Eighth Avenue, Inc.285 A.D. 541 (1955)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Zartman v. First Nat'l Bank, 82 N.E. 137 (N.Y. 1907) 67
Alchar Realty Corp. v. Meredith Rest., Inc., 256 A.D. 853 (1939) 10
F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. Amsterdam Tavern, Inc., 171 Misc. 352 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1939) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list