TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Determining the Validity of the Right of Election in the Estate of Hearn

In the Matter of Determining the Validity of the Right of Election in the Estate of Cathleen G. Hearn, William G. Hearn, Appellant Joseph P. Kissling, etc., of Cathleen G. Hearn

In re Determining the Validity of the Right of Election in the Estate of Hearn, 261 A.D. 924 (1941)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 18, 1941
Citations
261 A.D. 92425 N.Y.S.2d 7581941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8108

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County, entered after trial by the court *925 without a jury, adjudging that the notice of election filed by the appellant, surviving husband, under section 18, Decedent Estate Law, is invalid, and that the appellant is not entitled to share in the decedent’s estate, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate, and the matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for entry of a decree accordingly. Abandonment was not an issue in the case, and, in any event, was not established by the evidence. (Thompson v. Thompson, 163 Misc. 946 ; affd., 254 App. Div. 601 .) The only issue was whether the execution of the separation agreement of February 10, 1938, operates to deprive the surviving spouse of the right of election under section 18, Decedent Estate Law. The instrument has no such effect, as it was not acknowledged in accordance with subdivision 9 of the statute, (Matter of McGlone, 284 N. Y. 527 , decided December 31, 1940; Matter of Israel, 149 Misc. 620 .) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 11944: 11954: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Estate of Schwimmer8 Misc. 2d 550 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1944)
  2. In re the Estate of Howland284 A.D. 306 (1954)
  3. Kissling v. Hearn264 A.D. 900 (1942)

Most recent

  1. In re the Estate of Howland284 A.D. 306 (1954)
  2. In re the Estate of Schwimmer8 Misc. 2d 550 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1944)
  3. Kissling v. Hearn264 A.D. 900 (1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
In re the Estate of McGlone, 32 N.E.2d 539 (N.Y. 1940) 46
Thompson v. Thompson, 163 Misc. 946 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1937) 12
Thompson v. Thompson, 254 A.D. 601 (1938) 11
In re the Estate of Israel, 149 Misc. 620 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1933) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list