TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Macauley v. Barr & Lane, Inc.

Walter A. Macauley v. Barr & Lane, Inc., Yonkers Hoisting Corp., Hernandez Contracting Co., Inc., Wielandt Construction Company, Inc., and New York School for the Deaf

Macauley v. Barr & Lane, Inc., 264 A.D. 741 (1942)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 27, 1942
Citations
264 A.D. 74134 N.Y.S.2d 4291942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4457

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Plaintiff, an employee of a subcontractor, fell when about to ascend a ladder which was generally used as a means of access to a building under construction. The defendants are the owner, its agent and builder, and subcontractors, one of whom erected the ladder. Judgment dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents Hernandez Contracting Co., Inc., Wielandt Construction Company, Inc., and one bill of costs to respondent Barr & Lane, Inc., and New York School for the Deaf. The ladder had been used by plaintiff and other workmen as a means of access for eight or ten days prior to the happening of the accident. There had been no indication, during this time, that it was in any way unsafe. Plaintiff found it secure at all times prior to the accident. It was secure fifteen minutes before the accident occurred, when he used it to descend. It was then firmly placed and firmly fixed. There was no showing that the ladder was in any way defective. The only inference which may be drawn is that within the period of fifteen minutes prior to the happening of the accident, the ladder had been taken out of position so that its lower ends were not evenly placed or its top was not flush against the side of the building, or both. Under such circumstances there is no actionable negligence in the absence of notice. (Dougherty v. Weeks & Son, 126 App. Div. 786 ; Wynn v. Carlin, 135 id. 795 .) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1955: 119552026peak 1955 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Dougherty v. D. C. Weeks & Son, 126 A.D. 786 (1908) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list