The Nationalist Movement v. The City Of Cumming
The Nationalist Movement, a Mississippi Non-Profit Corporation Incorporated in Georgia v. The City of Cumming, Forsyth County, Georgia, Forsyth County Board of Education
Subsequent history: aff'd sub nom. Forsyth Cnty. v. Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S. 123 (1992). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion
921 F.2d 1125 33 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 668
The NATIONALIST MOVEMENT, a Mississippi non-profit corporation incorporated in Georgia, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF CUMMING, FORSYTH COUNTY, GEORGIA, Forsyth County Board of Education, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-8417.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 18, 1990.
Richard Barrett, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff-appellant.
Gordon S. Smith, S. Samuel Griffin, King & Spalding, Atlanta, Ga., for City of Cumming.
Robert S. Stubbs, III, McVay & Stubbs, Canton, Ga., for Forsyth County, Georgia.
Sam S. Harben, Jr., Harben & Hartley Law Firm, Gainesville, Ga., for Forsyth County Bd. of Educ.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, O'Kelley, District Judge, Presiding.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, COX, BIRCH AND DUBINA, Circuit Judges * .
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion October 2, 1990, 11th Cir., 1990, 913 F.2d 885 )
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument during the week of February 11, 1991. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
* Judge Edmondson is recused and will not participate in this decision
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.