Phillip Wallace v. Merle D. Robinson, Zenon Symanski, Michael O'Leary and Michael P. Lane
Phillip WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Merle D. ROBINSON, Zenon Symanski, Michael O’Leary and Michael P. Lane, Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
ORDER On consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc and of the response filed thereto in the above-entitled cause, a vote of the active judges of the court was requested. A majority of the judges voted to rehear this case en banc.
2
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion entered in this case on September 26, 1990 be, and is hereby, VACATED. This case will be reheard en banc at the convenience of the court.
2
. Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Circuit Judge, voted to deny rehearing en banc.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.