TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Falin v. Lyford

Kirk Falin v. Frederic E. Lyford, as Trustee of New York, Ontario & Western Railway

Falin v. Lyford, 267 A.D. 931 (1944)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 15, 1944
Citations
267 A.D. 93146 N.Y.S.2d 8231944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5570

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit rendered by the Supreme Court, entered in Madison County (Personius, J.) June 19, 1943, upon the ground that the evidence failed to establish any actionable negligence on the part of the defendant and that plaintiff was free from contributory negligence as a matter of law. Plaintiff sued to recover for personal injuries he sustained when he drove his automobile onto a grade railroad crossing over a public highway and collided with the forty-seventh freight car of a train which defendant was then moving *932 over it. Plaintiff was wholly familiar with the crossing. The night was -foggy. Plaintiff testified he saw the pavement marking, warning of the crossing, which was fourteen feet therefrom and as well previous warning signs; that his visibility ahead of his vehicle was about five feet and that the sight of one .eye, was seriously impaired. Judgment affirmed, without costs. AE concur. [See post, p. 1008.]

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1963: 11993: 119632026peak 1963 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ritter v. Merenda159 Misc. 2d 863 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1993)
  2. Danbois v. New York Central Railroad189 N.E.2d 468 (N.Y. 1963)

Most recent

  1. Ritter v. Merenda159 Misc. 2d 863 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1993)
  2. Danbois v. New York Central Railroad189 N.E.2d 468 (N.Y. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list