Pearlstein v. Baff
Daniel Pearlstein v. Lawrence W. Baff, (Consolidated appeals.)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Defendants appeal from an interlocutory judgment impressing a trust on certain real property and granting other incidental relief. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The finding that the property in question was an asset of the partnership has no support in the evidence. Appeal from decision dismissed. Appeal by defendants Garvin and Claridge Food Products Corp. from an order denying their motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence dismissed, without costs. In view of the determination of the appeal from the interlocutory judgment, the appeal from the order is academic. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.