TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Palazzola v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance

Anthony Palazzola, Doing Business as Lakeview Contracting Co. v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co.

Palazzola v. Pa. Fire Ins., 273 A.D. 856 (1948)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 2, 1948
Citations
273 A.D. 85676 N.Y.S.2d 3041948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4971

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Action on an insurance policy to recover a loss due to malicious mischief. Order denying defendant insurer’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action is barred because of the failure of plaintiffs to commence the action within twelve months after the happening of the loss, according to the terms of the policy, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Defendant rejected the claim, at the latest, approximately one and one-half months before the expiration of the twelve-month period. No prejudice to plaintiffs resulted which could lead to a meritorious claim of waiver or estoppel. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1961: 11964: 11966: 11978: 119612026peak 1961 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dupuis v. Van Natten61 A.D.2d 293 (1978) · Dissent
  2. Fotochrome, Inc. v. American Insurance26 A.D.2d 634 (1966)
  3. Skylark Enterprises Inc. v. American Central Insurance13 A.D.2d 707 (1961)
  4. Chambers v. Glens Falls Insurance41 Misc. 2d 727 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1964)

Most recent

  1. Dupuis v. Van Natten61 A.D.2d 293 (1978) · Dissent
  2. Fotochrome, Inc. v. American Insurance26 A.D.2d 634 (1966)
  3. Chambers v. Glens Falls Insurance41 Misc. 2d 727 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1964)
  4. Skylark Enterprises Inc. v. American Central Insurance13 A.D.2d 707 (1961)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list