TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Cohen

The People of the State of New York v. Irving Cohen

People v. Cohen, 273 A.D. 978 (1948)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 19, 1948
Citations
273 A.D. 97878 N.Y.S.2d 5551948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5572

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Judgment of the County Court, Kings County, convicting defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, on numerous counts, and imposing sentences thereon, and orders, affirmed. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell and Johnston, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment on the law, to dismiss the indictment, and to dismiss the appeal from the orders, with the following memorandum: The case against appellant is entirely circumstantial. There is evidence that he aided and assisted Lobel, a codefendant (see People v. Lobel, post, p. 978, decided herewith), to cash checks in New York County, and that the checks were stolen. There can, however, be no exclusive inference from the evidence that appellant had knowledge that the checks were stolen; and it can as readily be inferred from the evidence that his knowledge was to the effect that the checks were of another character. The specific crimes submitted to the jury by the trial judge were not proved beyond a reasonable doubt to have been committed by the appellant.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1973: 119732026peak 1973 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Extradition of Shapiro352 F. Supp. 641 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)

Most recent

  1. In re the Extradition of Shapiro352 F. Supp. 641 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list