McAlonen v. McAlonen
Eleanor McAlonen v. James F. McAlonen
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to renew, on additional papers, a previous motion for a counsel fee for services in opposing a motion by defendant to reduce alimony and for other relief, which previous motion had been *717 denied by order dated January 15, 1951, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, the motion granted, with $10 costs, and a counsel fee of $200 awarded, to be paid within ten days after the date of the entry of the order hereon. In our opinion, under the circumstances disclosed, the denial of a counsel fee was an improvident exercise of discretion. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.