Jacoubovitch v. Jacoubovitch

Anna Jacoubovitch v. Armand Jacoubovitch

Jacoubovitch v. Jacoubovitch, 279 A.D. 1027 (1952)

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided: April 21, 1952
Citations: 279 A.D. 1027112 N.Y.S.2d 11952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5696

Cited by 9 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Johnston, Acting J. P., Adel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., concurs on the authority of Taubenfeld v. Taubenfeld ( 276 App. Div. 873 ) but adheres to the views expressed in his dissenting memorandum in that case. [See post, p. 1078.]

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that non-U.S. citizens who entered United States on non-immigrant visas in connection with employment within the state were not precluded on that basis from establishing domicile in New York)

Torrico v. Int'l Bus. MacHines Corp., 213 F. Supp. 2d 390 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

Cited by 9 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Alves v. Alves262 A.2d 111 (D.C. 1970)
Torrico v. International Business MacHines Corp.213 F. Supp. 2d 390 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)
Nicolas v. Nicolas444 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Grabowski v. Borucinska-Grabowska, No. Fa 93 54413 S (Feb. 10, 1994)1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 1391 (1994)
Gosschalk v. Gosschalk138 A.2d 774 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1958)
Bodfish v. Gallman50 A.D.2d 457 (1976)

Most recent

In re Alan S.M.C.2018 NY Slip Op 2459
Torrico v. International Business MacHines Corp.213 F. Supp. 2d 390 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)
Grabowski v. Borucinska-Grabowska, No. Fa 93 54413 S (Feb. 10, 1994)1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 1391 (1994)
Nicolas v. Nicolas444 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Bodfish v. Gallman50 A.D.2d 457 (1976)
Cocron v. Cocron84 Misc. 2d 335 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list