TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Siers v. Greiner

Darwin Rusty Siers, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Stephen F. Greiner, Individually, and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Wood County, Lewis E. Guinn, Holmes R. Shaver, Steven Grimm, Individually, and in Their Official Capacity as Wood County Commissioners, David W. Avery, Dr., Individually, and in His Official Capacity of Jail Doctor at Wood County Corrections Center

Siers v. Greiner, 924 F.2d 1053 (4th Cir. 1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 13, 1991
Docket
No. 90-6116
Citations
924 F.2d 10531991 WL 161391991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5245
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

924 F.2d 1053 Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Darwin Rusty SIERS, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen F. GREINER, Individually, and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Wood County, Lewis E. Guinn, Holmes R. Shaver, Steven Grimm, Individually, and in their official capacity as Wood County Commissioners, David W. Avery, Dr., Individually, and in his official capacity of jail doctor at Wood County Corrections Center, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6116.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 23, 1990. Decided Feb. 13, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-696)

Darwin Rusty Siers, appellant pro se.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Darwin Rusty Siers appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Siers v. Greiner, CA-90-696 (S.D.W.Va. July 31, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list