TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Nigri

Matter of Fabrizio Nigri

In re Nigri, 32 Misc. 392 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1900)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
August 15, 1900
Judges
McAdam
Citations
32 Misc. 39266 N.Y.S. 182
Headnotes
Naturalization — Change of name after issue of certificate — Remedy. The court will not amend a naturalization certificate so as to make it conform with a new Christian name which the petitioner has since been legally permitted to assume. The petitioner will be permitted either to renaturalize under his new name, upon surrendering the old certificate and filing with the original declaration a certified copy of the order changing his name, or he may annex a certified copy of the order to the certificate already issued.
Summary
Application to amend naturalization certificate.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — McAdam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

McAdam, J.

The petitioner was naturalized in the New York Superior Court October 23, 1891, under the name of Patrick *393 Nigri. Thereafter, and on July 27, 1900, he obtained an order changing his name to Fabrizio Nigri; and he now moves to amend his certificate of naturalization to conform to the change. The order was made in an independent proceeding, and in no way necessitates or even permits an amendment of the certificate of naturalization. Amendments are sometimes allowed in naturalization as in other special proceedings, but only to correct some error existing at the time of naturalization; and the sole purpose is to make the record a truthful one. The petitioner may have recourse to one of two remedies. He may renaturalize under the new name upon surrendering the old certificate and filing with the original declaration a certified copy of the order changing his name; or he may annex a certified copy of said order to the naturalization certificate already issued, and the two documents read together will constitute one truthful history and make a record that answers all legal requirements. The only effect of the order of this court was to permit the petitioner to thereafter bear a new name. It took from him none of his legal rights, and did not impair those flowing from or growing out of the naturalization. To change the record in the manner sought would insert in a document issued in 1891 a name which the petitioner did not then bear. The application in the present form must, therefore, be denied.

Application denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1925: 119252026peak 1925 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Wolton125 Misc. 564 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1925)

Most recent

  1. In re Wolton125 Misc. 564 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list