TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Schnabel v. American Educational Alliance

E. Carl Schnabel v. The American Educational Alliance

Schnabel v. Am. Educ. Alliance, 79 Misc. 624 (1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 15, 1913
Judges
Bijur
Citations
79 Misc. 624140 N.Y.S. 369
Headnotes
Contracts — of employment — agreement to pay fifty dollars a week absolutely. Depositions — read on trial — exclusion of cross-examination. A contract of employment by which plaintiff had a “ drawing account of fifty dollars per week against commission at a fixed rate,” etc., is an agreement to pay fifty dollars a week absolutely. After the direct testimony of plaintiff taken by deposition has been read on the trial, it is reversible error to exclude his cross-examination because defendant declines to read the answers.
Summary
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, borough of Manhattan, fourth district, rendered in favor of the defendant after a trial by a judge without a jury.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bijur

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Bijur, J.

This judgment seems to have been rendered on the theory that a contract of employment which gave the plaintiff a “ drawing account of fifty dollars per week against commission at a fixed rate, etc.,” was not an agreement to pay fifty dollars per week absolutely, but only conditioned on the securing of orders. In this the learned *625 court was in error. Schlesinger v. Burland, 42 Misc. Rep. 206 .

The exclusion of the so-called cross-examination of the plaintiff in a deposition, because the defendant declined to read the answers and plaintiff’s counsel thereupon offered to read them, also constituted reversible error. Kalkhoff Co. v. Russian Church, 67 Misc. Rep. 107 .

Seabuey and Gebabd, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 11927: 11929: 11930: 11933: 11939: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Shaler Umbrella Co. v. Blow227 N.W. 1 (Wis. 1929)
  2. Donahoe v. Herrick260 P. 150 (Idaho 1927)
  3. Dugan v. Forster285 P. 384 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
  4. Schnabel v. American Educational Alliance148 N.Y.S. 1143 (1914)
  5. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. C. M. Johnston & Sons Sand & Gravel Co.103 F.2d 275 (8th Cir. 1939)
  6. Reynolds v. Wood65 S.W.2d 1114 (Tex. App. 1933)

Most recent

  1. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. C. M. Johnston & Sons Sand & Gravel Co.103 F.2d 275 (8th Cir. 1939)
  2. Reynolds v. Wood65 S.W.2d 1114 (Tex. App. 1933)
  3. Dugan v. Forster285 P. 384 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
  4. Shaler Umbrella Co. v. Blow227 N.W. 1 (Wis. 1929)
  5. Donahoe v. Herrick260 P. 150 (Idaho 1927)
  6. Schnabel v. American Educational Alliance148 N.Y.S. 1143 (1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Schlesinger v. Burland, 42 Misc. 206 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1903) 28
Kalkhoff Co. v. Russian Orthodox St. Nicholas Church, 67 Misc. 107 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1910) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list