Roth v. Gotthold
Joseph Roth and Julius Hammel v. Arthur F. Gotthold
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Bijur, J.
This action is brought to recover supplies sold to a trustee in bankruptcy and used in the continuation of the- business of a bankrupt. To the complaint, defendant had interposed a demurrer, which was overruled and a formal order entered thereon, the judge who rendered the decision writing an opinion.
It appears that the trustee had been authorized by the federal court to continue the business; also to raise money on receiver’s certificates “ for the use of the trustee in the continuance and operation of the business of the said bankrupt. ’ ’ The judge who overruled the demurrer was of opinion—in which I agree with him—that the decision in Matter of Erie Lumber Co., 150 Fed. Rep. 817, was decisive of the interpretation of this order, to the effect that the authority of the trustee to continue the business was dependent on raising the money for that purpose by means of *365 receiver’s certificates. At all events, the decision overruling the demurrer is the law of this case.
Defendant thereafter interposed an answer which, so far as meeting the decision on the demurrer goes, sets out substantially that plaintiffs were creditors of the bankrupt and themselves joined in authorizing the defendant-trustee to continue the business on credit. Of this there was no proof. The judgment dismissing the complaint, therefore, was in plain disregard of the law of the case as settled on demurrer, and the judgment must, therefore, be reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the .event.
Guy and Pendleton, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.