TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commercial Holding Co. v. Garaventa

Commercial Holding Company v. Peter Garaventa and Another

Commercial Holding Co. v. Garaventa, 133 Misc. 373 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
November 30, 1928
Judges
Taylor
Citations
133 Misc. 373231 N.Y.S. 4851928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1136

Opinion of the Court — Taylor

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Taylor, J.

Upon the separate trial which was directed of the issues arising by virtue of the plaintiff’s reply to the equitable counterclaim of the defendants herein, I find as a fact, upon all the evidence, that the defendants did not (nor did either of them) sign the trade acceptance in suit. The conclusion follows that the said acceptance is not enforcible in the hands of the plaintiff. Therefore, judgment is directed herein as follows: (1) Declaring said instrument void and of no effect and directing its surrender and cancellation; (2) dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint upon the merits, with taxable costs and disbursements to the defendants.

Settle decision and judgment upon notice. The plaintiff may present requests to find upon which I will pass. All papers will be retained by me pending the settlement of the decision and judgment.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list