TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rapid Machine Works, Inc. v. Silberstein

Rapid Machine Works, Inc. v. Marcus Silberstein

Rapid Mach. Works, Inc. v. Silberstein, 140 Misc. 30 (1930)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 15, 1930
Citations
140 Misc. 30

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

We think the stipulation of counsel should be construed to permit defendant to mitigate his damages in the conversion action by showing the return of the goods and their value at that time, as an offset to the damages prima facie established by proof of value at the time of conversion.

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Lydon and Peters, JJ., concur; Frankenthaler, J., concurs in result.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1940: 11975: 119402026peak 1940 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. American East India Corp. v. Ideal Shoe Co.400 F. Supp. 141 (E.D. Pa. 1975)
  2. Kapsemalis v. Taylor112 F.2d 406 (10th Cir. 1940)

Most recent

  1. American East India Corp. v. Ideal Shoe Co.400 F. Supp. 141 (E.D. Pa. 1975)
  2. Kapsemalis v. Taylor112 F.2d 406 (10th Cir. 1940)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list