TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Allen Hodge v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility

Allen HODGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert J. HENDERSON, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee

Hodge v. Henderson, 929 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 26, 1991
Docket
Nos. 284, Docket 90-2443
Judges
Altimari, Feinberg, Meskill, Per Curiam
Citations
929 F.2d 611991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4879

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Duffy, J., on July 30, 1990, denying Hodge’s petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus but granting a certificate of probable cause. Hodge, having been convicted of first degree robbery after a jury trial in the Supreme Court of New York, is currently incarcerated at a New York state correctional facility. In support of his habeas petition, Hodge advanced numerous arguments before the district court. Hodge limited his appeal of that decision to three specific claims: (1) he was denied his Sixth Amendment right of self-representation, (2) the identification procedures which resulted in his arrest were unconstitutionally suggestive, and (3) the trial court’s alibi instruction unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof away from the state.

Judge Duffy, in a well reasoned and comprehensive opinion, rejected each of these arguments. After reviewing the record and hearing the arguments of counsel, we agree with the district court’s analysis. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of the habeas petition substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Duffy in his memorandum opinion dated July 26, 1990. 761 F.Supp. 993 (S.D.N.Y.1990).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1993: 21994: 21998: 32000: 12003: 12020: 119932026peak 1998 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Barnett954 P.2d 384 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)
  2. People v. Barnett954 P.2d 384 (Cal. 1998)
  3. People v. Rudd63 Cal. App. 4th 620 (1998)
  4. Roldan v. Artuz78 F. Supp. 2d 260 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)
  5. State v. Spencer519 N.W.2d 357 (Iowa 1994)
  6. Piper v. Portuondo82 F. App'x 51 (2d Cir. 2003)

Most recent

  1. Pinckney v. LeeNo. 1:10-cv-01312 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 19, 2020)
  2. Piper v. Portuondo82 F. App'x 51 (2d Cir. 2003)
  3. Roldan v. Artuz78 F. Supp. 2d 260 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)
  4. People v. Barnett954 P.2d 384 (Cal. 1998)
  5. People v. Barnett954 P.2d 384 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)
  6. People v. Rudd63 Cal. App. 4th 620 (1998)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hodge v. Henderson, 761 F. Supp. 993 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) 14

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list