TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lind v. Miller

In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Alfred B. Lind and Norman L. Marks, Copartners, Doing Business as Lind & Marks, Judgment Creditors v. Robert Miller, Judgment Debtor Raphael A. Egan, Third Party

Lind v. Miller, 145 Misc. 477 (1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 2, 1932
Citations
145 Misc. 477260 N.Y.S. 3431932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1595

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

An allowance made to an incompetent World War veteran is exempt from levy and sale by virtue of an execution, and from seizure in any legal proceeding. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 667.) Obviously, this would be so if the pension has been received by the veteran, his committee or guardian; otherwise such an exemption can produce no beneficial effect. (Benedict v. Higgins, 165 App. Div. 611 ; Surace v. Danna, 248 N. Y. 18 .)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1935: 11936: 11938: 119352026peak 1935 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Estate of McCormick169 Misc. 672 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938)
  2. In re the Estate of Murray159 Misc. 865 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1936)
  3. In re the Estate of Cerello155 Misc. 709 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1935)

Most recent

  1. In re the Estate of McCormick169 Misc. 672 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938)
  2. In re the Estate of Murray159 Misc. 865 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1936)
  3. In re the Estate of Cerello155 Misc. 709 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Surace v. Danna, 161 N.E. 315 (N.Y. 1928) 134
Benedict v. Higgins, 165 A.D. 611 (1915) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list