Goldkopf v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Rose Goldkopf v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed, with twenty-three dollars costs.
Lydon and Levy, JJ., concur.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Callahan, J.
(dissenting). I dissent and vote to reverse the
judgment and dismiss the complaint on the merits on the ground that gas ranges furnished by a landlord in renting an apartment are not a part of the multiple dwelling within section 78 of the Multiple Dwelling Law. '
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.