TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rosenthal v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique

Winona L. Rosenthal v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, Also Known as " French Line,"

Rosenthal v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 170 Misc. 426 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1939)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
March 7, 1939
Judges
Nolan
Citations
170 Misc. 42612 N.Y.S.2d 1021939 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1852

Opinion of the Court — Nolan

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Nolan, J.

Motion by defendant for summary judgment granted. The passage contract issued by the defendant plainly states on its face that it is “ subject to the terms stated on this page and over-page.” On the bottom of the face of the contract appears the following: “ Passengers should read the terms of the contract of carriage stated below and overpage, their particular attention being called to the limitations of liability therein contained,” and at the bottom of the page there is the further warning: “ Stipulations limiting carrier’s liability are continued overpage.” On the back of the contract, under the heading “ Notice of claims and limitation of time for such notice and for suit thereon,” is a clause which provides that the carrier shall not be liable, “ unless a written claim therefor is lodged with the purser, prior to the passenger’s leaving the steamer,” and in any event unless a claim is made in writing and lodged with the carrier, “ within fifteen days after the passenger leaves the steamer.” This condition was not complied with and it does not appear under the ¿ircumstances disclosed, *428 that it was unreasonable. The plaintiff knew, or should have known, of the terms of the contract and accepted the conditions imposed when she took passage on the defendant’s steamship. (See Murray v. Cunard S. S. Co., Lim., 235 N. Y. 162 ; Garcin v. Compagnie Transatlantique, 160 Misc. 687 ; Eichler v. Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd., 169 id. 22.) Settle order on notice.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1955: 119552026peak 1955 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mangrelli v. Italian Line208 Misc. 685 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1955)

Most recent

  1. Mangrelli v. Italian Line208 Misc. 685 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1955)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Murrary v. Cunard S.S. Co., 139 N.E. 226 (N.Y. 1923) 79
Garcin v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 160 Misc. 687 (1936) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list