Zatz v. Zatz
Millie Zatz v. Joseph Zatz
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff may not maintain an action on the separation agreement for support and maintenance which by its terms was required to be and was incorporated in the divorce decree obtained by plaintiff. (See Breiterman v. Breiterman, 239 App. Div. 709 , and Landes v. Landes, 172 id. 758 .)
Judgment and orders reversed, with ten dollars costs, plaintiff’s motion denied, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted.
Hammer and Shientag, JJ., concur; Noonan, J., dissents.
Noonan, J. I dissent and vote for affirmance.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.