TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mutual Life Insurance v. Lester Pianos, Inc.

Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. Lester Pianos, Inc.

Mut. Life Ins. v. Lester Pianos, Inc., 180 Misc. 669 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
April 19, 1943
Judges
McLaughlin
Citations
180 Misc. 66942 N.Y.S.2d 3501943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2000

Opinion of the Court — McLaughlin

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

McLaughlin, J.

Motion for summary judgment made by the plaintiff. The action is to recover rent due under two written leases in the sum of $2,975, covering rent for the months of November and December, 1942, and January, 1943. The execution of the two written leases has been admitted, as well as the fact that this rent has not been paid. The only defense submitted is that by virtue of the provisions of War Productioi Board Order known as No. L-37-a (issued May 29,1942, 7 Fed eral Register 4036) the defendant was released from liability on the leases. There is no merit to this contention because an examination of the leases themselves shows that the premises, were to be used as a store for the sale and display of pianos. The restriction of the War Production Board order has to do with the manufacture, and not the sale, of pianos. Unless there is something in the order of the War Production Board making the use of the premises unlawful, there can be no release from the obligation to pay the rent set forth in the lease. (Byrnes v. Balcom, 265 App. Div. 268 ; Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Service, Inc., 265 App. Div. 411 , modfg. and affg. 178 Misc. 885 , which reversed 178 Misc. 879 .) Mere restriction of the manufacture of pianos cannot release the lessee whose lease calls for the use of the premises for the sale and display of pianos. The motion is granted. Settle order.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1944: 119442026peak 1944 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wood v. Bartolino146 P.2d 883 (N.M. 1944)

Most recent

  1. Wood v. Bartolino146 P.2d 883 (N.M. 1944)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Byrnes v. Balcom, 265 A.D. 268 (1942) 18
Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Serv., Inc., 265 A.D. 411 (1943) 14
Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Serv., Inc., 178 Misc. 879 (1942) 10
Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Serv., Inc., 178 Misc. 885 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1942) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list