Israel v. Krupa
Morris Israel v. Goldie Krupa, and Robert Krupa, Defendant-Respondent
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Memorandum Per Curiam.
Where a guest in plaintiff’s automobile sues plaintiff and defendants for personal injuries suffered as a result of a collision between two automobiles driven by plaintiff and defendant-respondent, the judgment obtained in her favor against plaintiff and in defendants’ favor may not be set up against plaintiff as res judicata in a subsequent action by plaintiff against defendant-respondent for property damage. (Self v. International Ry. Co., 224 App. Div. 238 .) The defendant not having appealed from the dismissal of his counterclaim he may not have a second trial. (Ginsberg v. City of Long Beach, 286 K Y. 400, 403.)
Judgment and order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.
Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.