Koerner v. Associated Linen Laundry Suppliers, Inc.
Philip Koerner v. Associated Linen Laundry Suppliers, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Memorandum Per Curiam.
The defendant was not a service establishment within the exemption of clause (2) of subdivision (a) of section 13 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (IT. S. Code, tit. 29, § 213, subd. [a], clause [2]) and plaintiff was engaged in an occupation necessary to the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of subdivision (a) *125 of section 7 of the Act (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 207, subd. [a]). (Philips v. Star Overall Dry Cleaning Laundry Co., 55 F. Supp. 238 , affd. sub. nom. Phillips v. Star Overall Dry Cleaning Laundry Co., 149 F. 2d 416 .)
The judgment should be modified by striking out the interest included in recovery, and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to respondent, and $150 attorney’s fee allowed him on the appeal.
Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.