Ray v. The Bark Henry Harbeck
Headnotes
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the Court, Bennett, J.
Tbe Henry Harbech was not a vessel used in navigating the waters of this state, within the meaning of the act known as the Boat and Tessel Act. The case falls directly within the decision of this court in the case of the Sea Witch. The vessel was used in navigating the high seas, and not the waters of this state, any farther than by entering the harbor of San Francisco from the ocean. It was held *452 in the case of the Sea Witch that an attachment could not issue against such a vessel. The judgment must be reversed.
Note,—At the same term of the court, the case of the Sea Witch was also affirmed in the case of Morey v. The Ship Andalusia,
Ordered accordingly.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.