Pacheco v. Bemal
JOSE D. PACHECO v. JUAN BEMAL
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
February 4th. On motion of Williams and Jones, for the respondents, and filing a transcript of the record, the appellant having failed to do so, and the transcript showing that the appeal was perfected November 3d, 1851, the Court ordered that the appeal be dismissed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.