TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sanchez v. Roach

GUADALUPE SANCHEZ v. WILLIAM ROACH, and Others

Sanchez v. Roach, 5 Cal. 248 (1855)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 1, 1855
Judges
Murray
Citations
5 Cal. 2481855 Cal. LEXIS 98
Syllabus
Where an appeal was'taken and perfected after the death of the appellant: Held, that there ivas no authority for prosecuting the cause in the name of the deceased; but that all proceedings should have been stayed until the executor or administrator could, by suggestion, have been made a party.
Summary
Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, Monterey County.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Murray

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

The appeal in this case, was taken and perfected in the Court below, after the decease of the appellant.

The affidavit of the respondents’ counsel, which is not contravened, shows that the appellant died on the same day that the judgment was rendered. There was then no authority for prosecuting the cause in the name of the deceased; but all proceedings ought to have been stayed until, by suggestion, his executor or administrator was made a party.

Let the appeal be dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1868–1869: 11892–1893: 11902–1903: 11914–1915: 118682026peak 1868 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Judson v. Love35 Cal. 463 (1868)
  2. In re Estate of Baker150 P. 989 (Cal. 1915)
  3. McCormick Harvesting Mach. Co. v. Snedigar53 N.W. 83 (S.D. 1892)
  4. Link v. Reeves88 N.W. 670 (Neb. 1902)

Most recent

  1. In re Estate of Baker150 P. 989 (Cal. 1915)
  2. Link v. Reeves88 N.W. 670 (Neb. 1902)
  3. McCormick Harvesting Mach. Co. v. Snedigar53 N.W. 83 (S.D. 1892)
  4. Judson v. Love35 Cal. 463 (1868)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list