TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

De Witt v. Porter

De Witt v. Porter, 13 Cal. 171 (1859)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 1, 1859
Judges
Terry
Citations
13 Cal. 171
Syllabus
A complaint, stating that whereas said defendant was justly indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of three thousand dollars for money paid, laid out, and expended, for the use and benefit of said defendant, and at his special instance and request, to-wit: at, etc. and on the 1st day of April, 1857, and in the sum of three thousand dollars, for money found to be due from the defendant to the plaintiffs on an account then stated between them; and the said defendant being so indebted to the plaintiffs afterwards, to-wit: on the day and year aforesaid, at the place aforesaid, undertook and faithfully promised the plaintiffs to pay the same, etc. and that said sum is due and unpaid, sufficiently states a cause of action.
Summary
Appeal from the Twelfth District. Complaint averred as in syllabus. Defendant demurred: 1. That the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. 2. That several causes of action were improperly united, without being separately stated. Demurrer overruled, with leave to answer on payment of costs. Defendant excepted, failed to pay the costs, and final judgment was entered for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Terry

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Terry, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Baldwin, J. concurring.

*172 The complaint in this cause sufficiently states a cause of action for money ascertained to he due, upon a statement of accounts, which, it is averred, defendant promised to pay. The demurrer was properly overruled.

It clearly appears, from the record, that the appeal is without merit. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with fifteen per cent, damages and costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1867–1868: 11887–1888: 118672026peak 1867 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Abadie v. Carrillo32 Cal. 172 (1867)
  2. Leeke v. Hancock17 P. 937 (Cal. 1888)

Most recent

  1. Leeke v. Hancock17 P. 937 (Cal. 1888)
  2. Abadie v. Carrillo32 Cal. 172 (1867)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list