TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. O'Connell

THE PEOPLE v. O'CONNELL

People v. O'Connell, 23 Cal. 281 (1863)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 1, 1863
Judges
Crocker
Citations
23 Cal. 281
Syllabus
A judgment by default should not be set aside by the ClWt,%nless the djEndant shows by competent proof, that the judgment was en!fee(l4j0|íSí|5lmistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect on his part; and the payment of costs should be imposed as a condition of setting aside the judgment.
Summary
Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, Contra Costa County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Crocker

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Crocker, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court—Horton, J. concurring.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a judgment by default, entered in an action for delinquent taxes. The judgment was rendered on the twenty-fifth day of March, 1862, against the defendant O’Connell and the real estate described in the complaint, for the amount of taxes, per eentage, and costs. The record shows that the summons was duly served on the defendant O’Connell and the real estate in the manner prescribed by the statute, on the thirtieth day of January, 1862, and that defaults were duly entered on the seventeenth day of February and the twenty-fifth day of March. On the ninth day of June, 1862, the defendants, without any affidavit or other showing, moved the Court to vacate the judgment, which was granted, and an order was entered accordingly, from which the plaintiffs appeal.

Sec. 68 of the Practice Act authorizes the Court, “ upon such terms as may be just, and upon payment of costs, to relieve any party or his legal representatives from a judgment, order, or other proceeding taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” The order itself is erroneous, in not imposing the payment of costs, as a condition of setting aside the judgment. But the Court also erred in making the order in the absence of any showing or proof on the part of the defendant, that the judgment was entered through mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect on his part. The facts should be made to appear by affidavit, or other proper proof, showing that the case is one provided for by said section to authorize the Court to make the order.

The order is reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1866–1867: 11874–1875: 11896–1897: 11912–1913: 11922–1923: 11932–1933: 11938–1939: 118662026peak 1866 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Erpenbach v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.67 N.W. 606 (S.D. 1896)
  2. Bailey v. Taaffe29 Cal. 422 (1866)
  3. Stub v. Harrison96 P.2d 979 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
  4. Hannah v. Wilson Lumber Co.114 S.E. 506 (W. Va. 1922)
  5. Heermanr v. Sawyer48 Cal. 562 (1874)
  6. Kinkead v. Moriarty136 N.W. 101 (S.D. 1912)

Most recent

  1. Stub v. Harrison96 P.2d 979 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
  2. Jacobsmeyer v. Superior Court22 P.2d 253 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
  3. Hannah v. Wilson Lumber Co.114 S.E. 506 (W. Va. 1922)
  4. Kinkead v. Moriarty136 N.W. 101 (S.D. 1912)
  5. Erpenbach v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.67 N.W. 606 (S.D. 1896)
  6. Heermanr v. Sawyer48 Cal. 562 (1874)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list