TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Blair v. Cummings

HENRY BLAIR v. JAMES H. CUMMINGS

Blair v. Cummings, 39 Cal. 667 (1870)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 1, 1870
Docket
No. 2,484
Judges
Sprague
Citations
39 Cal. 6671870 Cal. LEXIS 129
Syllabus
Judgment foe Costs on Dismissal of Appeal.—When a County Court dismisses an attempted appeal from a Justice’s Court, because of the failure of appellant to prosecute the appeal, or for want of jurisdiction of the subject-matter, it may render a judgment for costs against the appellant.
Summary
Certiorari to the County Court of Sacramento County. Suit was brought in the Justice’s Court of Lee Township, in Sacramento County, to recover damages in the sum of one hundred dollars. The Court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of §15 and costs. Notice of. appeal was filed with the Justice of the Peace, but was not served on plaintiff nor any one representing him. A sufficient undertaking on appeal was also filed and a transcript of the docket of the Justice of the Peace sent with the other papers to the County Court. On motion of plaintiff’s attorney, the appeal was dismissed because no legal notice had been served on plaintiff, and a judgment for costs rendered in favor of plaintiff for witness’ fees, etc. Motion was afterwards made by defendant to set aside the judgment for costs on the ground that the Court had no jurisdiction to render the same, which motion was overruled. Defendant thereupon applied to this Court for a writ, of certiorari, on the. ground that the County Court exceeded its jurisdic- ■' tion in rendering said judgment against the defendant, requiring said Court to certify the record and proceedings in the action of Blair v. Cummings, in said County Court, and for an order staying execution and all proceedings in the County Court herein until said writ be disposed of in the Supreme Court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Sprague

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Sprague, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court, Rhodes, C. J., Crockett, J., and Wallace, J., concurring.

The power of the County Court to render a judgment against appellant for costs on dismissal of an attempted appeal from a judgment of a Justice’s Court, by reason of failure of appellant to perfect his appeal, or for want of jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the appeal, is undoubted, and was directly affirmed by this Court in the case of The *670 People ex rel. Leet v. The County Court of Placer County, decided at the October Term, 1869.

The writ is, therefore, dismissed.

Temple, J., expressed no opinion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1889: 118892026peak 1889 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kent v. Board of Commissioners42 Kan. 534 (1889)

Most recent

  1. Kent v. Board of Commissioners42 Kan. 534 (1889)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list