Daverkosen v. Kelley
PETER DAVERKOSEN v. JOHN W. KELLEY
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
*478 By the Court, Niles, J.:
This was an action for goods sold and delivered. By stipulation of parties the cause was referred to a referee, “to take the evidence and report a judgment.” The referee subsequently reported a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount of his claim. The defendant then filed his statement, and moved for a new trial, and a new trial was granted. Upon motion of the plaintiff and against the objection of the defendant, the cause was again, referred to the same referee, to take the testimony and report a judgment. The defendant appeals from the final judgment rendered upon the second report of the referee, and assigns the last order of reference as error.
The point is well taken. Prior to the last order the referee had taken the testimony and reported a judgment. The powers conferred by the stipulation were then exhausted. When the new trial was granted the parties were restored to the position which they occupied when the issues were originally made. Either party could then demand a trial by jury, or object to a reference, which, in an action at law, can only be made by mutual consent.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.