Wilson v. Supervisors of Sutter County
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the Court:
The order brought up for review by the writ of certiorari purports to have been made under the latter portion of section 20 of the act of March 25th, 1868 (Stat. 1867-8, p. 316), entitled “An Act to provide for the protection of certain lands in the county of Sutter from overflow.” The section is as follows: “ Sec. 20. The Board of Supervisors are hereby authorized and required to remit the taxes on all the property left between Feather river and the levee or embankment in District No. 1; and said Board in their discretion and-for good cause shown, shall remit such other tax in said district as may to them seem just and proper.” The Board before making the order complained of, had as a Board of Equalization acted upon the assessment roll for the district. The order remits specified portions, and in some instances all of the taxes charged in such roll upon the property of the several persons mentioned in the order.
It was held in People v. Whyler, 41 Cal., 351 , that the act above mentioned provided for the levying of a tax on all the property within the several districts formed or to be formed by or under the act; and that the charge imposed upon property under the provisions of the act was a tax, and not an assessment. We adhere to that construction of the act.
The order under review, if valid, exempts from taxation certain property within the district, and exempts certain other property from a portion of the taxes charged upon it. The provisions of Sec. 13. Art. XI. of the Constitution, that “taxation shall be equal and uniform throughout the State,” and that “all property in this State shall be taxed in proportion to its value, to be ascertained as directed by law,” are applicable to taxes levied within any district in the State; and they require that where a tax is levied within any district, it shall be equal and uniform within such district, and that all property in the district shall be taxed in proportion to its value, to be ascertained as directed by *93 law. An order which remits the taxes upon any property within the district, causes the taxation within the district to be unequal, and is virtually an exemption of such property, from taxation; and if the order remits a part of the tax on such property, the result is the same, it differing only in degree. The clause of the twentieth section of the act above mentioned, providing that said Board in their discretion, and for good cause shown, shall remit such other tax in said district as may to them seem just and proper,” and the order of the Board of Supervisors, purporting to remit such taxes, are, in our opinion, repugnant to the provisions of the Constitution above cited, and must be held null and void.
The order of the Board of Supervisors is set aside and annulled.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 13 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.