TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Constantino Ocampa Aguirre v. Edwin Meese, Attorney General, and John Doe, Special Agent, in Their Individual and Official Capacities

Constantino Ocampa AGUIRRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edwin MEESE, Attorney General, and John Doe, Special Agent, in Their Individual and Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees

Constantino Ocampa Aguirre v. Meese, 930 F.2d 1292 (7th Cir. 1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 3, 1991
Docket
No. 90-1625
Judges
Cummings, Kanne, Per Curiam, Posner
Citations
930 F.2d 12921991 WL 689471991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8210

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

On July 20, 1990, by unpublished order, we affirmed the district court’s denial of Mr. Aguirre’s petition for mandamus, by which he sought to compel the Attorney General of the United States to conduct an expeditious deportation hearing in accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (i), a statute that was enacted in 1986 and that provides that “in the case of an alien who is convicted of an offense which makes the alien subject to deportation, the Attorney General shall begin any deportation proceeding as expeditiously as possible after the date of the conviction.” The Attorney General has requested that we publish our order in order to establish circuit-wide precedent that section 1252(1) does not create a private right of action. (Our unpublished orders are not citable as precedents. 7th Cir.R. 53(b)(2)(iv).) There is no need to publish the entire order. All we need do is make clear our agreement with Gonzalez v. INS, 867 F.2d 1108 (8th Cir.1989), which holds on grounds we find persuasive that section 1252(i) indeed creates no private right of action.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 25 cases

View all citing references →
1992: 71993: 21994: 41995: 41996: 42002: 12003: 12022: 219922026peak 1992 · 7

Most recent

  1. Aurel v. United States Federal CourtNo. 1:22-cv-01156 (D. Maryland June 30, 2022)
  2. Butt v. United StatesNo. 1:22-cv-00096 (D. Maryland Feb. 22, 2022)
  3. Hodel v. Aguirre260 F. Supp. 2d 695 (N.D. Ill. 2003)
  4. Koss v. Holm204 F. Supp. 2d 1099 (W.D. Tenn. 2002)
  5. United States v. Velasquez930 F. Supp. 1267 (N.D. Ill. 1996)
  6. United States v. Lopez938 F. Supp. 481 (N.D. Ill. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Gonzalez v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 867 F.2d 1108 (8th Cir. 1989) 34

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list