Constantino Ocampa Aguirre v. Edwin Meese, Attorney General, and John Doe, Special Agent, in Their Individual and Official Capacities
Constantino Ocampa AGUIRRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edwin MEESE, Attorney General, and John Doe, Special Agent, in Their Individual and Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
On July 20, 1990, by unpublished order, we affirmed the district court’s denial of Mr. Aguirre’s petition for mandamus, by which he sought to compel the Attorney General of the United States to conduct an expeditious deportation hearing in accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (i), a statute that was enacted in 1986 and that provides that “in the case of an alien who is convicted of an offense which makes the alien subject to deportation, the Attorney General shall begin any deportation proceeding as expeditiously as possible after the date of the conviction.” The Attorney General has requested that we publish our order in order to establish circuit-wide precedent that section 1252(1) does not create a private right of action. (Our unpublished orders are not citable as precedents. 7th Cir.R. 53(b)(2)(iv).) There is no need to publish the entire order. All we need do is make clear our agreement with Gonzalez v. INS, 867 F.2d 1108 (8th Cir.1989), which holds on grounds we find persuasive that section 1252(i) indeed creates no private right of action.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 25 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Roberto M. Cervantes v. A.D. Moyer, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, R.E. Holt, Warden
- Richard L. Barron Linda M. Barron v. Robert Reich Department of Labor Robert Kelley
- District of Columbia v. Sierra Club
- Edmundo M. Campos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Rodolfo Hernandez-Avalos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Koss v. Holm
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.