TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Barnes

THE PEOPLE v. JAMES M. BARNES

People v. Barnes, 48 Cal. 551 (1874)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 1, 1874
Docket
No. 10,094
Judges
Wallace
Citations
48 Cal. 5511874 Cal. LEXIS 194
Syllabus
Evidence on Tbiad bob Bübgbaby.—The prosecution, in an indictment for the crime of burglary alleged to have been committed by breaking and entering the room of D. with the intent to steal, cannot prove that the defendant entered a room of D. different from that alleged in the indictment, and at a time different from that alleged in the indictment, and stole money from D.
Summary
Appeal from the County Court, County of Tolo. The indictment alleged that the defendant on or about the 31st day of March, 1874, at the County of Tolo,' in the night time, broke and entered the sleeping apartment of E. F. Dubois, in the Capitol Hotel, in the town of Woodland, with the intent to steal the goods of said Dubois. On the trial, Mr. Dubois was called as a witness by the prosecution, and testified in the course of his examination, against the objection of the defendant, that, on the night of the 30th of November, the night previous to'the alleged burglary, he occupied a room in the Capitol Hotel, different from that alleged to have been broken, and adjoining thereto, and that defendant went with him into the room when he went to bed, and after he retired to bed, the defendant stole a half dollar in silver coin from his pocket, and then left the room. The defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Wallace

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court Wallace, C. J.:

The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of burglary, in breaking and entering the room and sleeping apartment of one Dubois, with intent to steal, etc.

On the trial the District Attorney, as part of his case in chief, was permitted, against the objection of the defend *552 ant, to prove that at a time and place admitted to be other than and distinct from those mentioned or intended to be charged in the indictment, the defendant entered a room, at the time occupied by Dubois, and stole a sum of money from him.

Upon settled principles governing the introduction of evidence in criminal cases, this was erroneous, and the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1890: 11895: 11901: 11902: 11923: 21930: 118902026peak 1923 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Stewart24 P. 722 (Cal. 1890)
  2. People v. Smith39 P. 40 (Cal. 1895)
  3. People v. Carpenter68 P. 1027 (Cal. 1902)
  4. People v. Gibson289 P. 937 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
  5. State v. Egan195 N.W. 642 (S.D. 1923) · Dissent
  6. People v. Henry88 N.W. 77 (Mich. 1901)

Most recent

  1. People v. Gibson289 P. 937 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
  2. State v. Egan195 N.W. 642 (S.D. 1923) · Dissent
  3. People v. Fleming194 N.W. 714 (Mich. 1923) · Dissent
  4. People v. Carpenter68 P. 1027 (Cal. 1902)
  5. People v. Henry88 N.W. 77 (Mich. 1901)
  6. People v. Smith39 P. 40 (Cal. 1895)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list