Wallace v. Miller
W. T. WALLACE v. HENRY MILLER
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
cited Gibbs v. Swift, 12 Cush. 393 ; Lawrence v. Bullon, 37 Cal. 518 ; Corbin v. Liv *656 ingston, 14 Wend. 619 ; Schenk v. Evoy, 24 Cal. 110 ; Gales v. Salmon, 35 Cal. 576 ; Kimball v. Semple, 25 Cal. 452 ; Ellis v. Icans, 26 Cal. 272 .
Francis E. Spencer, for Respondent.
By the Court :
It is ordered that " the judgment herein be and the same is hereby modified by the striking therefrom, wherever they occur, the words “ one twenty-eighth part,” and inserting in lieu thereof the words “ seven hundred and fifty twenty-one thousand three hundred and seventy-sevenths,” and in other respects the judgment and order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, are affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.