Holland v. Mount Auburn Gold Quartz Mining Co.
J. L. HOLLAND and EDWIN TILLEY v. MOUNT AUBURN GOLD QUARTZ MINING COMPANY
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the Court :
The defendant was in possession of the mining ground prior to the dates when the plaintiffs attempted to locate it, under the provisions of the Act of Congress of May 10, 1872.
Before the commencement of this action the location of plaintiffs was not distinctly marlced on the ground so that its boundaries could be readily traced, as required by the Act. (Rev. Stats. U. S. sec. 2324.)
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.