TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Spinetti v. Brignardello

Spinetti v. Brignardello, 54 Cal. 521 (1880)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 1, 1880
Docket
No. 7,008
Judges
Bench, Department, From
Citations
54 Cal. 521
Syllabus
Appeal—Dismissal op Appeal—Bap.—The dismissal of an appeal for failure to file the requisite papers—unless expressly made without prejudice— is a har to another appeal.
Summary
Motion to dismiss appeal.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Departmentfrombench

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Department No. 2, by the Court (from the Bench):

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The judgment in the Court below was entered January 28th, 1879. On the following day, defendants gave notice of appeal. July 14th, 1879, the appeal was dismissed by this Court, on the ground that no transcript was served or filed within the time prescribed .by law. The order of dismissal did not state that it was without prejudice to another appeal. December 27th, 1879, defendant C. R. Splivalo gave notice of appeal, and the transcript was filed February 24th, 1880. The motion is to dismiss the last appeal.

Section 954 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides for dismissing an appeal for failure to furnish the requisite papers, and § 955 provides that the dismissal of an appeal is in effect an affirmance of the judgment, unless the dismissal is expressly made without prejudice to another appeal.

The judgment being thus declared by the law to be affirmed, no subsequent appeal can be taken.

The motion is granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1883–1884: 11893–1894: 11933–1934: 11939–1940: 12019–2020: 118832026peak 1883 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Rosser91 P.2d 295 (Or. 1939)
  2. People v. Sonoqui35 P.2d 123 (Cal. 1934)
  3. Hollister v. Sherman63 Cal. 38 (1883)
  4. Fahey v. Belcher32 P. 1135 (Idaho 1893)
  5. Marriage of ShioNo. G058636 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 18, 2020)

Most recent

  1. Marriage of ShioNo. G058636 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 18, 2020)
  2. State v. Rosser91 P.2d 295 (Or. 1939)
  3. People v. Sonoqui35 P.2d 123 (Cal. 1934)
  4. Fahey v. Belcher32 P. 1135 (Idaho 1893)
  5. Hollister v. Sherman63 Cal. 38 (1883)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list