TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Quvise

PEOPLE v. M. QUVISE

People v. Quvise, 56 Cal. 396 (1880)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 1, 1880
Docket
No. 10,536
Citations
56 Cal. 3961880 Cal. LEXIS 414
Headnotes
Information—Misjoinder—Criminal Law.—Where the information charges two separate offenses, a demurrer on that ground should he sustained.
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of conviction, in the Superior Court of the County of Stanislaus. The information charges the defendant in one count with the larceny of a horse, saddle, and bridle, the property of J. Luke, and then proceeds as follows: And the said District Attorney, by way of setting forth the same offense in a different form, says, that at the said County and State, on the said 24th day of November, 1879, said M. Quvise did procure of the said J. Luke the loan of said horse, saddle, and bridle for a specified purpose, to wit, for the purpose of riding the said horse, saddle, and bridle from the residencc of the said J. Luke, in said county, to Hill’s Ferry, in the same county, and return; and having procured the loan of said horse, saddle, and bridle for said purpose, and having in said manner become the bailee of said horse, saddle, and bridle, the said M. Quvise did, at the said county of Stanislaus, State of California, on or about the 26th day of November, 1879, feloniously and fraudulently convert the same to his own use, contrary, etc.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Court :

Two separate and distinct offenses were charged in the information. The demurrer on that ground should have been allowed.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with direction to the Court below to sustain the demurrer.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1894: 11929: 118942026peak 1894 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. The People v. Shroyer168 N.E. 336 (Ill. 1929)
  2. People v. Clement35 P. 1022 (Cal. 1894)

Most recent

  1. The People v. Shroyer168 N.E. 336 (Ill. 1929)
  2. People v. Clement35 P. 1022 (Cal. 1894)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list