TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Estate of Bulmer

THE ESTATE OF HENRY M. BULMER

Estate of Bulmer, 59 Cal. 131 (1881)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 15, 1881
Docket
No. 7,544
Judges
Ross
Citations
59 Cal. 131
Headnotes
School District—Corporation—Will—Construction of Codes.—A school district is a corporation organized for educational purposes, and can therefore take by will.
Summary
Appeal from an order of distribution in the Superior Court of Alameda County. Green, J.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Ross

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Ross, J.:

The deceased died, leaving a will, which was admitted to probate, and by which, after directing the payment of his debts and making certain bequests, he devised the remainder of his estate to “ Laurel School District, of the town of Hayward, County of Alameda, State of California.”

The Court below found that the district in question was, at the time of the execution of the will, and still is, a public school district duly organized and established under and by virtue of the laws of this State, but was of the opinion that the devise thereto was void, and accordingly distributed the said residue to the heirs at law of the deceased. In this reepect the Court erred. Laurel School District is a corporation (Pol. Code, §§ 1575 et seq.; Dean v. Davis, 51 Cal. 406 ), and it is a corporation organized solely for educational purposes. (Pol. Code, supra.) It could therefore take by will. (Civ. Code, § 1275.)

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

McKinstrt, J., and McKee, J., concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1893: 11895: 11897: 11899: 11905: 11907: 11928: 11947: 218932026peak 1947 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kennedy v. Miller32 P. 558 (Cal. 1893)
  2. People ex rel. Post v. San Joaquin Valley Agric. Ass'n91 P. 746 (Cal. 1907)
  3. In re Estate of Royer56 P. 461 (Cal. 1899)
  4. Barber v. Mulford49 P. 206 (Cal. 1897)
  5. Ward v. San Diego School District265 P. 821 (Cal. 1928)
  6. Los Angeles School Dist. v. Longden83 P. 246 (Cal. 1905)

Most recent

  1. Estate of Hendrix176 P.2d 398 (Cal. Ct. App. 1947)
  2. California Trust Co. v. Burnell Institute of Spiritual Instruction176 P.2d 398 (Cal. Ct. App. 1947)
  3. Ward v. San Diego School District265 P. 821 (Cal. 1928)
  4. People ex rel. Post v. San Joaquin Valley Agric. Ass'n91 P. 746 (Cal. 1907)
  5. Los Angeles School Dist. v. Longden83 P. 246 (Cal. 1905)
  6. In re Estate of Royer56 P. 461 (Cal. 1899)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Dean v. Davis, 51 Cal. 406 (1876) 51

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list