Howard v. Jackson
ASA HOWARD v. B. C. JACKSON
Howard v. Jackson, 61 Cal. 620 (1882)
Syllabus
Appeal—Ebrob.—No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.
Summary
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Alameda. Crane, J.
Action on a promissory note. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The Court :
This is an action on a promissory note, the execution of which is admitted in the answer. The only defense is, that there was an extension of the time of payment. The findings are all in favor of the plaintiff, and no part of the evidence is brought up in the transcript. There is no error apparent in the proceedings, and the judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.