TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Barrett v. Simms

JOHN S. BARRETT v. J. V. SIMMS

Barrett v. Simms, 62 Cal. 440 (1882)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 22, 1882
Docket
No. 8,345
Citations
62 Cal. 4401882 Cal. LEXIS 758
Headnotes
Homestead—Insolvency Proceedings—Order of Sale—Jurisdiction.— An order of the Court in an insolvency proceeding for the sale of the homestead of the insolvent is without jurisdiction, and a sale thereunder ' passes no title.
Summary
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff and from an order denying a new trial in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento. Denson, J. In an insolvency proceeding the Court made an order setting apart to the insolvent his homestead, which contained the following clause: “Nothing contained herein shall have the effect to set aside to said Simms property of any greater value than $5,000. Nor shall it prejudice the right of the assignee herein, or of any creditor of said Simms, to sell said property, or to have it sold in case a bid of over $5,000 shall be made therefor.” Afterwards an order was made for the sale of the homestead, and the same was sold for the sum of $7,000 to the plaintiff, who brought this action to recover the land.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Court:

There is no statute of this State. authorizing a sale, in insolvency proceedings, of property which has been declared a homestead. Therefore, the proceedings had for a sale in this case passed no title.

Judgment and order reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1884–1885: 11888–1889: 11910–1911: 11914–1915: 11940–1941: 118842026peak 1884 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Boggs v. Dunn116 P. 743 (Cal. 1911)
  2. Thomas v. Speck118 P.2d 365 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)
  3. Lubbock v. McMann22 P. 1145 (Cal. 1889)
  4. Magneson v. Pacific Mfg. Co.146 P. 69 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  5. Dascey v. Harris4 P. 205 (Cal. 1884)

Most recent

  1. Thomas v. Speck118 P.2d 365 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)
  2. Magneson v. Pacific Mfg. Co.146 P. 69 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
  3. Boggs v. Dunn116 P. 743 (Cal. 1911)
  4. Lubbock v. McMann22 P. 1145 (Cal. 1889)
  5. Dascey v. Harris4 P. 205 (Cal. 1884)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list