TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McCue v. Superior Court

JAMES S. McCUE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MARIN COUNTY

McCue v. Superior Court, 12 P. 615 (Cal. 1887)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 14, 1887
Docket
No. 11802
Judges
McFarland
Citations
12 P. 61571 Cal. 5451887 Cal. LEXIS 418
Headnotes
Certiorari—Appealable Judgment or Order cannot be Reviewed on. —A writ of certiorari will not lie to review an appealable judgment or order either before or after the expiration of the time limited by law for appealing therefrom.
Summary
Application for a writ of certiorari to review an order' of the Superior Court of Marin County modifying a judgment which had theretofore been rendered in favor of the petitioner in a certain action entitled McCue v. Tunstead. At the date of the application for the writ, the time limited by law for appealing from the order had expired.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Court.

The writ must be dismissed. The writ will not lie where there is an appeal, and if there is an appeal, but the time for taking it has elapsed, the writ . will not lie. (In re Stuttmeister, ante, p. 322; Miliken v. Huber, 21 Cal. 166 ; Bennett v. Wallace, 43 Cal. 25 .)

Writ dismissed.

McFarland, J., concurring.

I concur in the judgment; but in my opinion there might be a case where, on account of unusual circumstances, a writ of review' would lie although there had been, at one time, a right of appeal, — as intimated in Kimple v. Superior Court of San Francisco, 55 Cal. 136 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1906: 11907: 11917: 11927: 11937: 11959: 119062026peak 1906 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Simmons v. Superior Court341 P.2d 13 (Cal. 1959)
  2. State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court70 P.2d 482 (Cal. 1937)
  3. Chapman v. Justice Court of Tonopah Township29 Nev. 154 (1906)
  4. Associated Credit Exchange v. Barnett259 P. 95 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
  5. Hall v. Justice's Court89 P. 870 (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)
  6. Maidenberg v. Justice's Court163 P. 872 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)

Most recent

  1. Simmons v. Superior Court341 P.2d 13 (Cal. 1959)
  2. State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court70 P.2d 482 (Cal. 1937)
  3. Associated Credit Exchange v. Barnett259 P. 95 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
  4. Maidenberg v. Justice's Court163 P. 872 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)
  5. Hall v. Justice's Court89 P. 870 (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)
  6. Chapman v. Justice Court of Tonopah Township29 Nev. 154 (1906)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Bennett v. Wallace, 43 Cal. 25 (1872) 21
Ames v. Eldred, 55 Cal. 136 (1880) 14
Miliken v. Huber, 21 Cal. 166 (1862) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list