TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Estate of Bauquier

In the Matter of the Estate of JOSEPH BAUQUIER

In re Estate of Bauquier, 26 P. 373 (Cal. 1891)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 28, 1891
Docket
No. 13979
Judges
Temple
Citations
26 P. 37388 Cal. 4781891 Cal. LEXIS 718
Syllabus
Estates of Deceased Persons — Qualification by Administrator — Prejudice against Executrix—Public Administrator.—The fact that a son of a decedent is prejudiced against his sister, who was named in the will as executrix, is not ground for holding, upon a contest between the son and the public administrator for letters of administration, that the son was thereby disqualified from acting as administrator, and that the public administrator should be appointed in preference to him.
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Sacramento County denying an application for letters of administration. The facts are stated in the opinion.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Temple

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Temple, C.

Joseph Bauquier died, leaving an estate estimated at about twenty thousand dollars. In his will he named his daughter, Mrs. Rode, executrix. Letters having been refused her, Frank Bauquier, a son of the deceased, the public administrator, and one Smith severally applied for letters. At the hearing a contest was inaugurated between Bauquier and the public administrator. The court denied the application of Bauquier and Smith, and appointed the public administrator, and thereupon Bauquier took this appeal.

An appeal had been previously taken by Mrs. Rode from the order denying her application to be appointed executrix. Since the submission of this case here, that order has been reversed, and thereby the right of Mrs. Rode to be appointed executrix apparently settled. The matters involved in this appeal, therefore, have become practically of little consequence.

We think, however, it must be held in this case that it was error to hold that the fact that Frank Bauquier was prejudiced against his sister disqualified him to act as administrator. Therefore the order denying his application and appointing the public administrator should be reversed.

Vanclief, C., and Foote, C., concurred.

The Court. — For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the judgment and order appealed from are reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11918: 119102026peak 1910 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Estate of Wright170 P. 610 (Cal. 1918)
  2. State ex rel. Flick v. Reddish129 S.W. 53 (Mo. Ct. App. 1910)

Most recent

  1. In re Estate of Wright170 P. 610 (Cal. 1918)
  2. State ex rel. Flick v. Reddish129 S.W. 53 (Mo. Ct. App. 1910)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list