TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Richter

THE PEOPLE, etc. v. L. E. RICHTER

People v. Richter, 45 P. 811 (Cal. 1896)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 24, 1896
Docket
No. Crim. No. 156
Citations
45 P. 811113 Cal. 4731896 Cal. LEXIS 813
Syllabus
Criminal Law—Setting Aside Information—appeal—Nonappealable Order—Dismissal.—An order setting aside an information accusing a defendant of a felony is not appealable, and an appeal by the people therefrom must be dismissed.
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Lassen County setting aside an information. W. T. Hasten, Judge. Defendants were accused, by information, of the crime of altering the brand on a certain steer, with intent to steal the same. Defendant Richter moved "the superior court to set aside the information on the grounds that before the filing of the said information he had not been legally committed by a magistrate: 1. In that there was not sufficient evidence produced before the magistrate to show the commission of a public offense, and that there was not sufficient cause to believe the defendant, L. E. Richter, guilty thereof; 2. That the order of commitment by the magistrate was not indorsed upon the written depositions taken at the preliminary examination. The court declined to pass on the first ground, but allowed the motion on the second ground. Further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Court.

After the district attorney had filed in the superior court an information against the defendant accusing him of a felony, the defendant moved the court to set the same aside on various grounds, and his motion was granted. From this order the people have appealed. The defendant objects to the hearing of the appeal upon the ground that the order is not appeal-able. Section 1238 of the Penal Code prescribes the cases in which an appeal may be taken by the people,, and the present order is not included therein.

The appeal is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1896: 11897: 21928: 11965: 118962026peak 1897 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People v. Hale232 Cal. App. 2d 112 (1965)
  2. People v. Ellis266 P. 518 (Cal. 1928)
  3. State v. Ridenbaugh51 P. 750 (Idaho 1897)
  4. State v. O'Brien50 P. 412 (Mont. 1897)
  5. People v. Higgins45 P. 1004 (Cal. 1896)

Most recent

  1. People v. Hale232 Cal. App. 2d 112 (1965)
  2. People v. Ellis266 P. 518 (Cal. 1928)
  3. State v. Ridenbaugh51 P. 750 (Idaho 1897)
  4. State v. O'Brien50 P. 412 (Mont. 1897)
  5. People v. Higgins45 P. 1004 (Cal. 1896)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list