TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Donald Teague

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald TEAGUE, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Teague, 932 F.2d 899 (11th Cir. 1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 17, 1991
Docket
No. 89-8181
Judges
Tjoflat, Fay, Krávitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina
Citations
932 F.2d 8991991 WL 816741991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10460
Cited by 5 Original from court

Opinion

*900 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRÁVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →
1991: 11992: 11999: 22019: 119912026peak 1999 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Donald Teague953 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir. 1992)
  2. Richard K. Wells, K-2894 v. George Petsock, Superintendent941 F.2d 253 (3d Cir. 1991)
  3. State v. Robinson982 P.2d 590 (Wash. 1999)
  4. State v. Robinson138 Wash. 2d 753 (1999)
  5. State Of Washington v. Oscar Luis UrbinaNo. 77795-5 (Wash. Ct. App. Apr. 22, 2019)

Most recent

  1. State Of Washington v. Oscar Luis UrbinaNo. 77795-5 (Wash. Ct. App. Apr. 22, 2019)
  2. State v. Robinson982 P.2d 590 (Wash. 1999)
  3. State v. Robinson138 Wash. 2d 753 (1999)
  4. United States v. Donald Teague953 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir. 1992)
  5. Richard K. Wells, K-2894 v. George Petsock, Superintendent941 F.2d 253 (3d Cir. 1991)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list