TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wood v. Jordan

ABBIE R. WOOD, Administratrix, etc. v. JAMES C. JORDAN

Wood v. Jordan, 57 P. 998 (Cal. 1899)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 30, 1899
Docket
No. S. F. No. 1087
Citations
57 P. 998125 Cal. 2631899 Cal. LEXIS 842
Syllabus
Action to Quiet Title—Answer Seeking to Quiet Defendant’s Title—Affirmative Relief—Dismissal by Plaintiff.—In an -action to quiet title, an answer setting up the defendant’s title and praying for a decree establishing it, and enjoining plaintiff from asserting any interest in the land, or interfering with defendant’s possession thereof, does not claim such affirmative relief under subdivision 1 of section 581 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as to preclude a judgment of dismissal of the action at the instance of the plaintiff.
Summary
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a motion to vacate the judgment. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

THE COURT.

An action was brought by the plaintiff to quiet his title to certain pieces of land in the city and county of San Francisco, plaintiff alleging that he was in possession.

Upon his death his administratrix was substituted in his place. Defendant answered asserting title in himself, denying plaintiff’s right of possession, alleging an ouster by plaintiff of defendant’s possession, and concluding with a prayer for a decree establishing his title and enjoining plaintiff from asserting any *264 claim to the land, or interfering in any manner with the possession thereof. Thereafter plaintiff procured a dismissal of the action, and a judgment of dismissal was duly given. Defendant then moved to vacate the judgment of dismissal, and from the order of the court refusing so to do he prosecutes this appeal.

. He insists that by his answer he seeks affirmative relief, and that under section 581, subdivision 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure, it was erroneous for the court, under these circumstances, to dismiss the action. But this contention has been definitively settled against him in Moyle v. Porter, 51 Cal. 639 .

The order appealed from is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1901: 119012026peak 1901 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Islais & Salinas Water Co. v. Allen64 P. 713 (Cal. 1901)

Most recent

  1. Islais & Salinas Water Co. v. Allen64 P. 713 (Cal. 1901)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Moyle v. Porter, 51 Cal. 639 (1877) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list