TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Globe Discount Co. v. Ostergard

GLOBE DISCOUNT COMPANY v. MRS. C. L. OSTERGARD, Defendants OKEY MEADOWS, as Administrator, etc.

Globe Disc. Co. v. Ostergard, 55 P.2d 1169 (Cal. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 24, 1936
Docket
No. L. A. No. 15640
Citations
55 P.2d 11695 Cal. 2d 6731936 Cal. LEXIS 449

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

THE COURT.

Motion to dismiss appeal or affirm judgment upon the ground that the appeal was taken for delay only, and that the questions on which the decision of the cause depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument.

The action is one to foreclose a street improvement bond. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Defendant has appealed. The appeal is on the judgment roll. Neither the pleadings in the action, the findings, or the judgment show that the appellant, nor the estate which he represents, has any interest in the subject of the action or in the result of this appeal. The complaint alleged that the appellant claims that said estate has a lien against or is the owner of some interest in the property. Even this allegation is denied by the appellant in his answer. Appellant is bound by the denials of his answer. The appellant is, therefore, in no position to ques *674 tion the validity of the judgment. Should the judgment be reversed it would avail the appellant nothing. The judgment should be affirmed on the ground that no substantial question is presented by the appeal, and it is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1948: 11967: 119482026peak 1948 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hamilton v. Hamilton189 P.2d 722 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)
  2. Leoke v. County of San Bernardino249 Cal. App. 2d 767 (1967)

Most recent

  1. Leoke v. County of San Bernardino249 Cal. App. 2d 767 (1967)
  2. Hamilton v. Hamilton189 P.2d 722 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list